Trending
The National Park Service ought to undertake a formal review of whether Chautauqua Institution continues to meet the standards required for National Historic Landmark designation. I am struck by how different parts of the grounds now feel. The scale, roof forms, materials, and contemporary architectural vocabulary of the Roe Green Theater Center, Greene Family Commons and the many of the newly built and renovated homes are noticeably out of character with much of Chautauqua’s historic built environment.
Chautauqua Institution's National Historic Landmark status recognizes one of America's most significant cultural and historic communities. However, the demolition of the original Amphitheater in 2016 and its replacement with a fake historic replica raise serious questions about the historic integrity of the district and whether the standards that govern the National Historic Landmark program continue to be satisfied.
The Amphitheater was not simply an old building. It was one of the defining resources that conveyed Chautauqua's national significance. An independent structural assessment by Old Structures Engineering concluded that the structure was repairable. Prior to demolition, Chautauqua itself stated publicly that rehabilitation and ongoing maintenance could allow the Amphitheater to remain in service for another century. Despite those findings and the objections of preservation advocates, architects, engineers, and longtime patrons, the Institution chose demolition and replacement.
The concern extends beyond the Amphitheater alone. The cumulative alteration of Chautauqua's historic landscape--including the replacement of original historic materials, the construction of historically styled but non-historic buildings and houses, and the increasing reliance on reproductions rather than preservation--raises broader questions about whether the district continues to retain the historic integrity for which it was recognized.
The National Historic Landmark program is founded on the principles of authenticity and historic integrity. The National Park Service evaluates historic properties based on their ability to convey significance through location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. These standards distinguish genuine preservation from the recreation of historic appearance.
I respectfully request that the National Park Service evaluate whether the cumulative changes to Chautauqua Institution's historic district have compromised the integrity that justified its designation and determine whether a formal review of its National Historic Landmark status is warranted.
My intention is not to seek punishment of the Chautauqua Institution, but rather to ensure that the standards of America's highest historic preservation designation remain meaningful and consistently applied.
Brian Berg is a Chautauqua Institution property owner and a Chicago resident.