To The Reader’s Forum:

The predominantly left-wing news media has a serious credibility problem it may never overcome. It’s scrambling to downplay the criminality of the previous administration that devised the Trump/Russia collusion nonsense as well as an assortment of other nefarious deeds while conversely attempting to incriminate the president at every turn. Its glaring bias and double-standard has consequently led many to question the veracity of its content and intrinsic motives. Its remaining audience has been reduced to a partisan, anti-Trump remnant that only believes what it wants to believe in spite of an evidentiary trail that ironically leads to the very players the liberal media is shielding from accountability.

Irrefutable evidence has unveiled a conspiracy by Hillary Clinton and her surrogates to sabotage Trump’s presidency. The fourth estate, by and large, has shown itself to be a willing accomplice, a conduit of disinformation laced with hyperbole more indicative of a rag publication and is indelibly linked to the dirty tactics designed to demonize and unseat this outsider who dared challenge the Establishment. Ethical investigative reporters outside the mainstream media like Sarah Carter and John Solomon have exposed the real collusive culprits that weaponized our government institutions. The House Intelligence Committee recently reaffirmed the validity of those reports based on undeniable evidence it finally received from the Justice Department after incessant stonewalling. The Inspector General’s comprehensive finding is expected to be a scathing indictment of the Obama Administration and its holdovers. We’ve already learned the IRS targeted opposition groups like the Tea Party. The IRS had no recourse but to admit its unsavory conduct after a lawsuit was filed on behalf of plaintiffs represented by the American Center for Law and Justice.

The progressive media’s complicity to undermine President Trump by obstinately holding firm to a scurrilous pretext it fully realizes is based on a fraudulent dossier while intentionally obfuscating or omitting information that scrutinizes the real conspirators has cast a giant shadow on its ethics and reliability. Its blatant malfeasance, motivated by an agenda driven by political bias, is an inexcusable breach of trust from an institution that supposed to be the vanguard of truth. Its descent into disingenuous yellow journalism is more than a reprehensible exercise in situational ethics where the end justifies the means. It’s an unconscionable betrayal!

Gabriel J. Feher

Jamestown