Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | All Access e-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 

Cuomo: NY Indian Casinos Could Face Competition

May 9, 2013

ALBANY (AP) — Gov. Andrew Cuomo says New York's Indian casinos could face competition in their backyards if tribes and the state fail to reach agreements in the coming months....

« Back to Article

 
 
sort: oldest | newest

Comments

(11)

KCW007

May-09-13 1:49 PM

From what I could make of the news conference is that Cuomo is now afraid of the possibility that the arbitration panel is going to award the Senecas huge damages for losses related to the state's "illegal" operations at the three Racinos. This in addition to the likely loss of the $600 million in question for the original exclusivity violation four years ago. The Compact allows the nation to keep ALL of the "State Contribution" if their exclusivity violation charge is duly upheld under the terms of the Compact.

5 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

50s4ever

May-09-13 1:54 PM

"tribes in good standing with the state"...there's a Cuomo opening for moving in next door when he says they are not in good standing. Sounds like the 19th century.

7 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

KCW007

May-09-13 2:14 PM

"..tribes in good standing with the state." Kind of racist there, aren't you Andy? In past eras weren't complaint tribes commonly referred to as the "good or civilized" Indians?

5 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

pinkpanther621

May-09-13 2:45 PM

I would definitely stay playing at the Seneca allegany Indian casinos. NY is so money hungry that your chances of winning would just about zero. And where would NY get the millions it needs to construct a casino anyway ? MORE BORROWING from the elderly or MORE CUTS to education?

6 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

KCW007

May-09-13 3:18 PM

That's a good question panther! In all likelihood the state would sell long term franchises to private companies who would build the facilities on their own dime, in return for a guaranteed "cut" of the operation ; sort of like the state did with the Senecas. Of course no private company is going to lay out that kind of capital investment without some guarantee of an exclusive sales territory, just like the exclusive territory that the state GUARANTTEEED to the Senecas back in 2001.

6 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

50s4ever

May-09-13 5:54 PM

Salamanca pays out better than the one in Erie for sure.

2 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

KCW007

May-09-13 8:05 PM

Correction @ 2:14p "complaint" does make sense does it? Should be "compliant" as in: "The compliant (read: submissive/agreeable) Indians were in good standing with the state".

1 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

cattpat

May-09-13 10:56 PM

Has the governor forgotten about the binding arbitration he agreed to on this matter Seems like he is putting the cart before the horse. His actions put him, and his administration, in a very bad position with the arbitration panel. And just what do the taxpayers end up with here? A very big legal bill?

3 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Harleywho

May-10-13 6:51 AM

Careful who you bully next andrew? You may have bitten off more than you can chew with these folks. They aren't teachers or cops.

2 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

mrinbetween

May-10-13 9:15 AM

What a F.I.

0 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Overdrive

May-10-13 5:40 PM

Just because a state constitutional amendment is up for a vote, doesn't mean it's going to pass!

0 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Showing 11 of 11 comments
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or
 
 
 

 

I am looking for:
in:
News, Blogs & Events Web