Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | All Access e-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 

Sheriffs Respond To SAFE Act Law

Letter Sent By Association To Gov. Cuomo’s Office

January 29, 2013

MAYVILLE — Some parts work. Some need clarification. That’s how Chautauqua County Sheriff Joe Gerace officially summed up New York state’s new gun-control law....

« Back to Article

 
 
sort: oldest | newest

Comments

(7)

yankee

Jan-29-13 3:25 AM

Thank you NYS Sheriffs for standing up and making a unified effort to straighten this mess out. However, I would like to read the Position Statement that, from what I can tell, accompanied that letter.

8 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Dexter

Jan-29-13 8:56 AM

The letter they sent is more patronizing than critical and will only embolden a clinical narcissist like Andrew Cuomo.

1 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

KCW007

Jan-29-13 9:21 AM

In the sheriff's letter to the governor, I'm puzzled about a portion found under the section entitled: Safe Storage of Firearms. It reads in part:, "The new law provides that guns must be safely stored if the owner lives with someone who has been convicted of a felony, domestic violence crime.....or is currently under an order of protection." Under long standing federal law(See "Lautenberg Amendment, et al) felons, persons convicted of misdeameanor domestic violence crimes and persons under court orders of protection for matters related to domestic violence, are prohibited from residing or, even being in places, where guns and ammunition are stored. The "owner"/occupant (a classic case would be wherein a girlfriend allows her felon boyfriend to live with her} is not allowed to keep guns and ammuntion in the house, therefore arms can't legally be stored there under any circumstances to being with, even if they are stored "safely".

2 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Larry1

Jan-29-13 9:23 AM

Headlines on MSN say that Chicago had 40 homicides in January. I thought Chicago had the strictest gun laws. It is possible that gang members don’t obey the laws?

7 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

50s4ever

Jan-29-13 11:33 AM

Once again, first responders are more valued lives than the citizens who pay them. An unarmed citizen killed is less a crime than an armed cop? Why?

1 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

hobby123

Jan-30-13 7:25 PM

Hope everyone read the first PJ article "Sheriff Supports Stricter Gun Laws, Second Amendment Rights". Boy is Gerace trying to have his cake and eat it too. Don't you just love the politicians that want it both ways. Gerace is a true Democrat and would really love to take away our 2nd amendment rights. Remember th3e 2nd amendment was not about hunting, it was about citizens protecting themselves from tyrannical government that takes away citizens rights.

2 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

NYResident

Jan-30-13 9:02 PM

Thank you to all of you for upholding the oath that you took. Our government seems to have forgotten what that means. We as law abiding citizens appreciate your confidence that we have not all become criminals. We can still act responsibly, which is more than our politically motivated government can say. We applaud your honor in taking this action on our behalf.

3 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Showing 7 of 7 comments
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or
 
 
 

 

I am looking for:
in:
News, Blogs & Events Web