Mitchell Garabedian, a Boston-based attorney who represents victims of sexual abuse, said the Catholic Church’s issues with child sexual abuse are potentially “endless.” Submitted photo

The shudder of an unsavory case first unearthed in Boston about 16 years ago is still being felt today, even in Western New York.

In January 2002, a secret world of child sex abuse was uncovered in the Catholic Church by a special team of investigative reporters at the Boston Globe known as the “Spotlight Team.”

Buffalo and the surrounding areas felt the reverberations this past week after the Buffalo Diocese released a list of 42 priests who had been removed from ministry, retired or had left ministry after allegations of sexual abuse of a minor. Many of those named in the list served in churches in Chautauqua and Cattaraugus counties.

ı ı ı

REPRESENTING VICTIMS

One of the main players in helping to unravel the secret abuse perpetrated by dozens of priests over many years is Mitchell Garabedian, a Boston-based attorney who specializes in sexual abuse cases. Garabedian said he has represented at least 20 clients in the Buffalo Diocese, which encompasses Chautauqua County and other areas in Western New York.

Garabedian was portrayed as a key component of breaking the case in Boston in the 2015 film “Spotlight.” In reality, he has been representing clients with sexual abuse claims against clergy for the past 25 years.

Garabedian said he has represented victims who were sexually abused by priests on the list released by the Buffalo Diocese last week as well as victims who were sexually abused by priests not on the list.

“There is no doubt in my mind that any priest on the list has abused hundreds of children while supervisors had knowingly turned their backs,” Garabedian told The Post-Journal during in a series of interviews.

“There is no moral excuse on earth for the Catholic Church’s actions — the secrecy must end.”

Garabedian said the list from the Buffalo Diocese is “by no means” a comprehensive list. Rather, he said what the diocese is doing now is how the church operates when under pressure. Garabedian said the diocese has not released the “secret documents” which would expose whether supervisors of the accused priests were aware of what happened or the names of the parishes where the priests were located. Garabedian said it is time for the diocese to release all the documents related to the reported abuse.

“Where has Bishop (Richard) Malone been for the past five years?” Garabedian asked. “When victims try to heal, they need more than just names.”

Garabedian said the problem is “endless,” and will outlive him. He said the actions of supervisors that would hide the abuse are “toxic, amoral and evil.”

“The acts of their supervisors are just as evil as the pedophiles,” Garabedian said.

ı ı ı

WISHES TO HELP

George Richert, spokesman for the Diocese of Buffalo said the idea behind putting out the list was to help victims. He couldn’t give a timeline of how long it took to compile the list, but said a lot of time and effort went into it.

“Bishop Malone felt it was important to release the names,” Richert said.

Richert said including the locations at which the priests served would have slowed down the process. He said if it is determined another priest should be on the list, the list will be updated.

“It’s a complicated process to determine what is an allegation and what is not,” he said.

The process of reviewing a possible abuse case begins with a call being made to Jacqueline Joy, victim assistance coordinator with the diocese. The report would be taken and reviewed by Auxiliary Bishop Edward Grosz and the diocesan review board.

“It’s that process that eventually led up to the 42 names,” he said. “It’s a process that didn’t just involve one or two people.”

Richert said there has been a victim assistance coordinator at the diocese for more than 10 years. When asked how complaints of abuse were handled before 2002, Richert said he couldn’t comment in any specific terms on how it was handled. However, Richert said in 2002, all bishops signed the Dallas Charter, which adopted a zero-tolerance policy for child sexual abuse and removed priests from ministry even if they would have previously gotten a “second chance” in the past.

Richert said the church cannot say that the allegations against all priests on the list were proven because some of the allegations were made after the priests were dead. He said if a priest died and there were no allegations made before he died, and one person came forward after he died with a complaint of child sexual abuse, the name was not put on the list.

However, if a priest died without any allegations against him and at least two victims came forward with allegations of abuse afterward, that person was added to the list.

Richert said the priests who remained alive on the list were made aware by the diocese they were being put on the list.